9781648027475-1648027474-Black Boys are Lit: Engaging PreK-3 Gifted and Talented Black Boys Using Multicultural Literature and Ford’s Bloom-Banks Matrix (Contemporary Perspectives on Multicultural Gifted Education)

Black Boys are Lit: Engaging PreK-3 Gifted and Talented Black Boys Using Multicultural Literature and Ford’s Bloom-Banks Matrix (Contemporary Perspectives on Multicultural Gifted Education)

ISBN-13: 9781648027475
ISBN-10: 1648027474
Author: James L. Moore III, Brian L. Wright, Donna Y. Ford
Publication date: 2022
Publisher: Information Age Publishing
Format: Paperback 124 pages
Category: Sociology
FREE US shipping
Buy

From $56.29

Book details

ISBN-13: 9781648027475
ISBN-10: 1648027474
Author: James L. Moore III, Brian L. Wright, Donna Y. Ford
Publication date: 2022
Publisher: Information Age Publishing
Format: Paperback 124 pages
Category: Sociology

Summary

Black Boys are Lit: Engaging PreK-3 Gifted and Talented Black Boys Using Multicultural Literature and Ford’s Bloom-Banks Matrix (Contemporary Perspectives on Multicultural Gifted Education) (ISBN-13: 9781648027475 and ISBN-10: 1648027474), written by authors James L. Moore III, Brian L. Wright, Donna Y. Ford, was published by Information Age Publishing in 2022. With an overall rating of 4.0 stars, it's a notable title among other Sociology books. You can easily purchase or rent Black Boys are Lit: Engaging PreK-3 Gifted and Talented Black Boys Using Multicultural Literature and Ford’s Bloom-Banks Matrix (Contemporary Perspectives on Multicultural Gifted Education) (Paperback) from BooksRun, along with many other new and used Sociology books and textbooks. And, if you're looking to sell your copy, our current buyback offer is $0.3.

Description

This book of matrices with Black boys as the main character is designed to help gifted and talented education teachers leverage Black boys’ identities to inform and shape how they plan and deliver curriculum and instruction and manage the multicultural, democratic, and culturally responsive classroom. Ford and colleagues (2005) spoke to the notion of and need for ‘self-reflective instruction.’ We argue that all teachers must want to and learn how to legitimize the “everyday” experiences that are learned and cultivated in the homes and communities of Black boys, and how these experiences shape their self-identities and contribute to agency (Wright, Counsell, & Tate 2015). We, therefore, advocate for the rethinking of literacies by repositioning White-centered texts that often reflect and represent power and privilege toward centering the brilliance of Black identities of Black children in general, Black boys in particular. Black boys (of all ages) want to and need to physically see positive images of themselves in books reflected at them. This representation, we argue, has the potential to become an example of a compelling counter-narrative to the history of the “all-White world” (Larrick, 1965) of children’s books that only presented Black characters as “objects of ridicule and generally inferior beings” (Sims Bishop 2012, p. 6). When Black boys see themselves portrayed visually, textually, and realistically in children’s books, vital messages of recognition, value, affirmation, and validation are conveyed. Recognition of the sociocultural contexts in which they live is celebrated. Books for and about Black boys must be rigorous, authentic, multicultural, and developmentally appropriate to allow them to synthesize what they have read, heard, and seen during literacy instruction in authentic and meaningful ways. Multicultural books must introduce children to information about the values of justice, fairness, and equity. Developmentally appropriate books should vary with and adapt to the age, experience, and interests of gifted and talented Black boys to allow them the opportunity to demonstrate critical thinking, textual analysis skills and convey conceptual knowledge. These stories must expose Black boys to culturally relevant counter stories -- stories that counteract the dominant discourse that has primarily depicted Black boys as “at risk” versus placed at risk; “without hope” versus hopeful; or “out of control and dangerous” (Tatum, 2005, p. 28) versus developing self-control like all other children (Wright et al., 2018).

Rate this book Rate this book

We would LOVE it if you could help us and other readers by reviewing the book