9780820461595-0820461598-Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950-1990 (Teaching Texts in Law and Politics)

Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950-1990 (Teaching Texts in Law and Politics)

ISBN-13: 9780820461595
ISBN-10: 0820461598
Edition: New
Author: Stacia L. Haynie
Publication date: 2003
Publisher: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers
Format: Paperback 170 pages
FREE US shipping

Book details

ISBN-13: 9780820461595
ISBN-10: 0820461598
Edition: New
Author: Stacia L. Haynie
Publication date: 2003
Publisher: Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers
Format: Paperback 170 pages

Summary

Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950-1990 (Teaching Texts in Law and Politics) (ISBN-13: 9780820461595 and ISBN-10: 0820461598), written by authors Stacia L. Haynie, was published by Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers in 2003. With an overall rating of 4.0 stars, it's a notable title among other South Africa (African History, Comparative, Legal Theory & Systems, Civil Procedure, Rules & Procedures) books. You can easily purchase or rent Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950-1990 (Teaching Texts in Law and Politics) (Paperback) from BooksRun, along with many other new and used South Africa books and textbooks. And, if you're looking to sell your copy, our current buyback offer is $0.3.

Description

Despite the increasing recognition of judges as political actors, few studies have empirically explored the role and function of courts in repressive regimes. Based on individual case studies as well as empirical analyses of all the reported decisions of the highest appellate court in South Africa, Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950-1990 creates a portrait of the individuals who staffed the bench during the rise and fall of apartheid. This book explores the dilemma of judging in a system that juxtaposes the formal law and the repressive law. Regardless of their adherence to a formal-law approach to judging, the adjudicative function cannot be fully separated from the larger moral questions embedded in these systems. This text evaluates the response of judges to this dilemma through institutional, individual and longitudinal analyses of judicial decision making.

Rate this book Rate this book

We would LOVE it if you could help us and other readers by reviewing the book