Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition
ISBN-13:
9780268029692
ISBN-10:
0268029695
Edition:
First Edition
Author:
Dermot Moran, Stephen Gersh
Publication date:
2006
Publisher:
University of Notre Dame Press
Format:
Paperback
328 pages
Category:
History & Surveys
,
Philosophy
FREE US shipping
Book details
ISBN-13:
9780268029692
ISBN-10:
0268029695
Edition:
First Edition
Author:
Dermot Moran, Stephen Gersh
Publication date:
2006
Publisher:
University of Notre Dame Press
Format:
Paperback
328 pages
Category:
History & Surveys
,
Philosophy
Summary
Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition (ISBN-13: 9780268029692 and ISBN-10: 0268029695), written by authors
Dermot Moran, Stephen Gersh, was published by University of Notre Dame Press in 2006.
With an overall rating of 3.5 stars, it's a notable title among other
History & Surveys
(Philosophy) books. You can easily purchase or rent Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition (Paperback, Used) from BooksRun,
along with many other new and used
History & Surveys
books
and textbooks.
And, if you're looking to sell your copy, our current buyback offer is $0.3.
Description
Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition is a collection of original essays presented at an international conference held in Dublin in 2002 and subsequently revised in light of discussions at the conference. As Stephen Gersh and Dermot Moran explain in their introduction, this book asks the question: What do philosophers mean by “idealism?” According to Gersh and Moran, the question of idealism is a difficult one, not only because of the historical complexity of the term “idealism” as they have sketched it but also because understanding of the phenomenon is dependent upon the observer's own philosophical persuasion. The essays in this volume take up the question of “idealism” in the history of philosophy from Plato, through late ancient and medieval thought, to Berkeley, Kant, and Hegel. Although there are obvious discontinuities among these versions of idealism, the degree of continuity is sufficient to justify a reexamination of the entire question.
We would LOVE it if you could help us and other readers by reviewing the book
Book review
Congratulations! We have received your book review.
{user}
{createdAt}
by {truncated_author}